Massachusetts has among the most restrictive gun control laws in the country. The Bay State is one of an exceedingly small group of states, along with Illinois, to require a license to merely own any type of firearm. Long terrible on Second Amendment rights, in 2024 the state enacted Chapter 135, a 116-page bill that overhauled state gun laws to further attack law-abiding gun owners.
In the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), that acknowledged the Second Amendment protects the individual right to keep and bear arms, Justice Antonin Scalia noted some of the arms that come under this protection.
For better and for worse, Second Amendment and firearms related law, especially over the past 20 years, has developed into an extraordinarily dense and complex legal field.
Parents and others have expressed concerns over a continuing decline in student literacy rates and math skills. At the same time, there’s a worrying erosion of common sense and critical thinking on the part of some school administrators.
With only a single day left in the 2026 legislative session, anti-gun radicals seem unable to take the hint from their last four attempts to push the gun control "wish list" package through the legislature, and have again introduced it under a new bill number.
Last year, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office filed a lawsuit against Glock, Inc. under the state’s public nuisance law. This week, in connection with that lawsuit, FFLs across the state started receiving subpoenas demanding production of customer records regarding the lawful sale of all Glock pistols to New Jersey residents for the last ten years.